← Models

Model profile

Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro

ByteDancedeveloper
2026-02-14release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#329 / 663Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 5 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjection (safety_score, #11 of 63); its weakest is Concordia — DarkBench (safety_score, #49 of 55).

Freedom. Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro has an estimated Freedom rank of #329; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #195–#484. Published Freedom evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #11 of 63); its weakest is LiveSecBench (legality, #34 of 43).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#47 / 54↑52.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#44 / 63↑72.96Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#41 / 56↑77.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#45 / 63↑82.66Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#32 / 55↑18.02Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#11 / 63↑95.62Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#49 / 55↑44.39Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#36 / 54↑39.56Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#35 / 54↑39.81Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#34 / 54↑53.11Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#35 / 45↑24.22Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#34 / 45↑14.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#20 / 45↑3.333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#38 / 45↑28.67Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#51 / 62↑47.76Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#53 / 63↑54.55Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#47 / 63↑9.692Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#32 / 53↑99Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#16 / 63↑94.6Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#35 / 63↑85.8Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#18 / 43↑55.1Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#11 / 43↑67.71Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#10 / 43↑78.59Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#16 / 43↑62.37Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#21 / 43↑51.42Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#20 / 63↓72.96Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#15 / 56↓77.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score#30 / 56↓66.19Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#18 / 63↓82.66Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#19 / 54↓39.56Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#20 / 54↓39.81Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#21 / 54↓53.11Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#11 / 45↓24.22Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#12 / 45↓14.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#22 / 45↓3.333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#8 / 45↓28.67Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#11 / 63↓54.55Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#17 / 63↓9.692Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#47 / 63↓94.6Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#29 / 63↓85.8Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#26 / 43↓55.1Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#34 / 43↓78.59Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#28 / 43↓62.37Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#23 / 43↓51.42Source ↗official