← Models

Model profile

Deepseek V4 Flash

DeepSeekdeveloper
2026-04-22release date
#68 / 309overall rank
18eval lineages
4discovery sources

Evidence summary

Deepseek V4 Flash has an estimated overall rank of #68; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #54–#199. Its behavior-only rank is #57; company governance moves the combined estimate to #68. Published evidence spans 18 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Manager Coercion Bench (coercion_ladder_depth, #1 of 31); its weakest is Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECT (safety_rate, #10 of 10).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#240 / 3280.8897Source ↗official
ANIMAscore#3 / 220.7445Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#64 / 1121432.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#72 / 1060.16Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#23 / 5060.9Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#27 / 5058.1Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#27 / 5072.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#37 / 5069.03Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#28 / 5069.83Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#30 / 5074.3Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#136 / 24114.73Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#227 / 24170.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#94 / 24176.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#187 / 23991.64Source ↗official
Governance Decay under Passive Context Compactiongovernance_retention_score#6 / 741Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#10 / 5428.57Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSbenign_answer_rate#1 / 1099.2Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSharmful_refusal_rate#10 / 1032Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECTsafety_rate#10 / 1097.4Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#1 / 134.43Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#1 / 313.233Source ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#4 / 70.417Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#3 / 70.508Source ↗official
Olam Social Poker — Social Lie Ratesocial_lie_rate_per_10000_turns#15 / 1937Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#59 / 660.323Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#13 / 700.8188Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#28 / 700.9507Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#42 / 670.4549Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#38 / 7981.95Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#66 / 7975.89Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#35 / 7994.24Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#19 / 7969.94Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#54 / 7959.56Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#34 / 1136.9Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#75 / 1134.7Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#58 / 1134.75Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#59 / 1132.05Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#57 / 7621.15Source ↗official
ToolPrivacyBenchprivate_mt_poi#6 / 927.33Source ↗official
ToolPrivacyBenchpublic_mt_poi#6 / 918.99Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-16.6
Government46
Diplomacy66
Economy46.2
Society59

CCPBench political narrative alignment

DimensionValueDistribution
CCP-narrative alignment — all questions3.57
CCP-narrative alignment — China topics4.03
CCP-narrative alignment — non-China controls2.22

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression2.27
Traditional ↔ Secular-1.75