Model profile
Deepseek V3.2 Exp
Evidence summary
Deepseek V3.2 Exp has an estimated overall rank of #96; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #19–#241. Its behavior-only rank is #84; company governance moves the combined estimate to #96. Published evidence spans 6 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is UAVBench safety-critical decision recognition (ethical_safety_critical_accuracy, #1 of 27); its weakest is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #110 of 113).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Hugging Face ↗deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- OpenRouter ↗deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-exp
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr | #24 / 48 | ↑82.5 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #24 / 112 | ↑1455.0 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #67 / 241 | ↑23 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #190 / 241 | ↑81.5 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #184 / 241 | ↑46.67 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #156 / 239 | ↑94.55 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #110 / 113 | ↑6.23 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #75 / 113 | ↓4.7 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #72 / 113 | ↓4.85 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #45 / 113 | ↓1.9 | Source ↗official | |
| UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy | #1 / 27 | ↑0.775 | Source ↗official | |
| Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate | #13 / 94 | ↑94.7 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.